bilaterals.org logo
bilaterals.org logo

All articles

US-Congo (Rep.of) BIT (1994)
23-Mar-2004
US-Turkey BIT (1990)
23-Mar-2004
US-Romania BIT (1994)
23-Mar-2004
US-Albania BIT (1998)
23-Mar-2004
US-Armenia BIT (1996)
23-Mar-2004
US-Azerbaijan BIT (2001)
23-Mar-2004
US-Bulgaria BIT (1994)
23-Mar-2004
US-Croatia BIT (2001)
23-Mar-2004
US-Estonia BIT (1997)
23-Mar-2004
US-Georgia BIT (1997)
23-Mar-2004
Africa Growth and Opportunities Act (2000)
22-Mar-2004
US-Nicaragua IPR agreement (1998)
20-Mar-2004
US-Peru IPR MOU (1997)
20-Mar-2004
US-Philippines IPR Understanding (1993)
20-Mar-2004
US-Trinidad & Tobago IPR Agreement (1994)
20-Mar-2004
US-Taiwan IPR Agreements (1992-1993)
20-Mar-2004
US-Viet Nam copyright agreement (1997)
20-Mar-2004
Switzerland-Viet Nam IPR agreement (1999)
20-Mar-2004
Why we say no to CAFTA
20-Mar-2004
This document is the product of a collective effort by a group of Central American and U.S. women and men. It is part of a comprehensive public-education campaign on the U.S.-Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) being carried out by Central American and U.S. organizations in the Bloque Popular Centraomericano and the Hemispheric Social Alliance.
Expanding Intellectual Property’s Empire: The Role of FTAs
20-Mar-2004
Intellectual property rights were important to chemical firms in nineteenth century Europe and to US and European pharmaceutical companies in the twentieth century. The relationship was one of mutual importance. Because these companies wanted intellectual property rights, especially patents they took an interest in lobbying governments on their design.